Archive for Swim News

Swim Teams Making a Difference – What Can Your Team Do?

We’ve all heard about athletic events held to raise money to support important causes. The sport of swimming is another great avenue for supporting non-profits. Our year round and summer teams have participated in several donation-raising opportunities.

It’s easy to coordinate a cause-related event (often called swim-a-thons). It can be a local, national or global cause. You can hold the event during a normal practice. Swimmers can collect donations based on laps completed or distance swum during a specific time period. Businesses are typically very willing to donate as are family members and neighbors.

We had a student from a high school organize a fund-raiser called “Laps for Life” to raise scholarship money in memory of a swimmer who died in a car accident. He had been drinking and the parents wanted to use the event to promote awareness among young people of the dangers of underage drinking and driving while intoxicated. Local businesses, swimmers, family members and neighbors donated to the cause.

Your club or team can raise money for causes like breast cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer’s, animal welfare, environmental issues. There are numerous opportunities. So think about organizing an event around the sport of swimming. It can make a difference.

A few upcoming opportunities that have already been organized and only require your participation:

Make a Splash, Make a Difference! Swim for the Severn!
Annapolis, Maryland
Saturday, August 2nd
www.severnriverkeeper.org

Weymouth Bay Swim
British Heart Foundation
Sunday, August 9th
The National Kidney Research Fund
On-going (organize your own swimathon)
Emma Dowler on 01384 340783 or email emma.dowler@nkrf.org.uk
www.nkrf.org.uk

Aspire – the UK’s leading spinal injury charity
THE ASPIRE CHANNEL SWIM 2009
Monday 14th September – Sunday 6th December 2009
http://www.aspire.org.uk/channelswim/

Aaron Peirsol’s Race for the Oceans
Fort Myers Beach in Fort Myers, Fla.
October 10-11, 2009
www.racefortheoceansevent.com

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

LZR from Speedo available – 5 Reasons NOT to buy one for your swimmer

The LZR Racer, which reached must have status after its stellar showing at the US Olympics in Beijing earlier this year, is now available at a swim store near you.

While they are a completely mind-blowing piece of technology, they really do not have a place in competitive swimming (at least if you have any respect for swimming as a sport). Oh…and don’t forget that they are super cool looking!

In fact, my own 10 year old son (9 at the time) expressed his desire to have one of the LZR jammers. At his age, it was more about the fact that he had seen the likes of Michael Phelps sporting the LZR line of technical suits than his interest in being faster.

According to Speedo’s own website, “These are very high performance products and limited numbers are available worldwide”.

In my opinion, this means: limited quantities = higher prices = cost prohibitive = creates an unequal playing field = bad for the sport.

So why do I believe you should not buy these for your swimmers?

  • Cost: This reason is self explanatory if you look at the pricing for this Speedo line of tech suits. Even if cost was taken out of the equation, there are several other reasons parents should make the decision to say no to these types of suits.
  • Do we really want to give our youth the misconception that these things are a “magic bullet” for being FAST? It’s implied by the nature of marketing and product development that sport equipment manufacturers are already at work on their next” latest and greatest” world record shattering technology.
  • Do we want our swimmers to feel like they have to have the leading suit on the market to be competitive? And how many would-be swimmers would be lost because of the higher cost of participation in the already costly sport? This is not in the best interest of swimming.
  • Should our young swimmers be focusing on what tech suit is the fastest or on mastering the essential technical aspects of each stroke and event?
  • There is still a controversy over these types of suits crossing the line between legal in competition and that of being performance enhancing and therefore banned from competition.

Thankfully, there is currently a moratorium on use of the suits through the 2008-09 NCAA competitive swim season. Unfortunately, the main reasoning is due to the availability of the suits and not the underlying principle of keeping the sport of swimming pure.

However, there is still a chance the moratorium could remain intact even after the availability issues have been worked out.

The CSCAA…expressed concern that the suits may, in fact, aid in flotation and
enhance performance — both explicitly prohibited by FINA and NCAA rules.
Independent scientific testing, currently under way, should resolve that
issue within the next few months. To date, other than the CSCAA, the only
other major swimming body in the USA to take the position that the suits should
not be allowed is the American Swimming Coaches Association (ASCA). Last
weekend, USA Swimming banned the suits from age group competition only.

So at least for now, the younger swimmers will not be immediately impacted by the use of these suits in competition.

By the way? Did I mention the price?

Speedo Male LZR Racer Highneck Bodyskin: $545.95
Speedo Male LZR Racer Legskin: $345.95
Speedo Male LZR Racer Jammer: $285.95
Speedo Female LZR Racer Record Breaker Kneeskin: $419.95
Speedo Female LZR Racer Highneck Bodyskin: $545.95
Speedo Female LZR Racer Record Breaker Bodyskin Price: $469.95

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

Yet Another Post about the Phelps Cavic Finish in the 100 Fly

There are so many posts about the finish of the men’s 100 Fly in Beijing, but I just had to chime in.

If I had not seen the scoreboard, I would not have thought Phelps would have been the gold medalist in the 100 meter butterfly. Phelps’ mom and Bob Bowman couldn’t believe it either. It was that close.

If anything shows the importance of the finish in the sport of competitive swimming, this race makes the point clear. Cavic clearly had Michael beat, but made the “micro-split” second decision to not take an additional stroke and finished with a long glide. Phelps, on the other hand, exploded into the wall with a powerful, lightning fast, extra stroke. Had he not done this, Cavic would have been wearing a gold medal around his neck.

You can currently see a frame shot of the finish from beneath here… (Not sure how long these pics will stay up due to the controversial nature of the finish).
del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

Cullen Jones and 4×100 Gold Medal Relay Team Split Times

I’ve had a few of you ask about the split times for the USA Men’s 4×100 2008 Beijing Olympics Freestytyle Relay Team – Oh, and in case you need a recap…

  • They won the Gold
  • They set a new World Record (which they set at Prelims and then broke their own record in the Finals)
  • Lezak swam the fastest relay leg in history
  • The Finish was Unbelievably Intense
  • Official Time of 3:08.24

The individual splits…

Phelps
23.31 – 24.20 – 47.51

Weber-Gale
21.89 – 25.13 – 47.02

C. Jones
22.68 – 24.97 – 47.65

Lezak
21.50 – 24.56 – 46.06

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

Cullen Jones 4×100 Gold Medal Relay Interview Video

WAIT!

I apologize for the 31 second ad on here (part of the terms of use of the video) but it’s totally worth it!

You may need to click the player button twice on some browsers.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

Cullen Jones and US Olympic Team’s 4×100 Free Relay Make A Splash

The US Men’s 4×100 Olympic relay team of Phelps, Weber-Gale, Jones and Lezak reclaimed the event for the US and set a new world record by completing the 400 metres in 3:08.24.

The race was insanely intense and nothing was sure until the final touch. Cullen told reporters that he was so excited he almost fell in the water. Phelps and Weber-Gale were in a state of uncontrollable excitement and Lezak had just completed the all time fastest split of 46.06.

Back to Cullen Jones, and nothing against any of the other relay swimmers.

There is a stark difference between the yearly drowning rates of minorities in the US compared to white children and that is where Cullen is focusing his efforts.

Cullen is already involved in Make A Splash, a USA Swimming organization dedicated to promoting water safety. Jones dreams of creating his own initiave called “The Cullen Jones Diversity Tour” where he will be connecting with children and youth with the goal of educating them about the importance of swimming and motivating them to learn this important survival skill.

No doubt, the exposure Jones is getting from his successes in swimming along with his charismatic personality, will allow him to continue making an impact on the lives of children and parents who otherwise would not realize the importance of learning to swim.

You can help a child learn to swim (a child who would otherwise not have the opportunity) by sponsoring a series of lessons through Make A Splash.

Make A Splash
http://usaswimming.org/
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/3363011/
del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

New OSB11 Starting Block by OMEGA to be Introduced in September in time for the FINA Swimming World Cup Season

The 2008 FINA Swimming World Cup will be held in October and November and will mark the competitive debut of the intriguing new starting block by Omega.

The OSB11 will include a patented adjustable “wedge” addition, similar to the starting block used in track events. The OSAB11 allows a 90 degree position of the knee on the block. This means an increase in propulsive power and an expected drop in time for swimmers.

Omega introduced the blocks earlier in the year. The subsequent proposal to allow them at Beijing Olympics was highly controversial. After much debate, FINA voted that more time was needed for the athletes to train with the blocks before using them in competition.

Omega’s OSB9 Starting Block & OSB10 Starting Platform was used in Athens for the 2004 Olympics and are currently being used in the Beijing 2008 Olympics.

Omega Live Timing Results of the Olympics
Beijing 2008 Swimsuits

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

China’s Vows for Cleaning Up for the Olympic Games is Covered in Blanket of Smog

Photos taken by Bobak Ha’Eri

China’s smog problem is nothing new and when they were awarded the bid for hosting the 2008 Olympic Summer Games, they vowed to have a “Green” Olympics in Beijing.

Now, only 10 days before the start of the Olympics, China is covered in yet another blanket of thick smog. This smog is composed of industrial pollution, automobile exhaust and contruction dust, all of which cause health concerns for Olympic athletes and spectators.

The government is taking drastic measures to clear the air; but at what cost to the people who live and work in Beijing and the surrounding cities? Ninety percent of cars will not be allowed to start up, factories (reportedly up to 100 miles away) have been shut down and the economic system has come to a virtual standstill in a final effort to clear the air in time for the Olympic Games.

Beijing’s air quality is not up to what the world is expecting from an Olympic host city; the sports teams have reason to be concerned,” Greenpeace’s campaign director, Lo Sze Ping in Beijing, said during a news conference on Monday. Ping attributes this condition to what he describes as a “develop first, clean up later” mentality to economic growth.

But is it too late to clear the air? Beijing won its’ bid to host the Games in 2001 promising to clean up the environmental quality of the city in time for the 2008 Summer Olympics. Du Shaozhong, an environmental protection official, indicated that the city had lived up to its’ promise. “Indeed, we have reached our commitment to make sure air quality is satisfactory for the Games”.

Dr. Patrick Schamasch, the IOC’s medical and scientific director likewise said,
“Today, there is nothing critical preventing an athlete from running, except the visibility, I can tell you it’s mist more than smog.”

Evidently, several athletes and Olympic committees do not see the “stuff” in the air as “mist”.

  • The United States Olympic Committee and other delegations have made protective masks available to the athletes.
  • U.S. swim team head coach and general manager, Mark Schubert, said USA Swimming had asked the USOC for protective masks about 18 months ago, due to athletes with asthma.
  • The Ethiopian marathon world record holder, Haile Gebrselassie, withdrew from the 42km event a few months ago stating “The pollution in China is a threat to my health and it would be difficult for me to run 42km in my current condition. Gebrselassie is asthmatic.
  • Australian Olympic officials have given their athletes the opportunity to withdraw from events in Beijing if they are concerned about their health without the usual consequences.
  • Great Britain’s women’s hockey team has wearing red contact lenses in an attempt to improve their vision in the smog of Beijing.

The opening ceremony of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing will be held in the Beijing National Stadium on August 8th. Hopefully the air qulity will have improved by then.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

Swimmer Jessica Hardy – Condemned as a Cheater – Premature?

FACTS:

Jessica Hardy has no other reported positives for the banned substance Clenbuterol.

Clenbuterol is not approved in the US to treat asthma which is why it is not available for Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) by WADA.

Clenbuterol is available as a prescription bronchodilator in OTHER countries but not the US.

In the US, Clen IS approved for veterinary use in horses.

Clenbuterol is readily available on the internet.

Clenbuterol, according to the USDOJ Drug Enforcement Agency, is used as a preferred performance related substance by female athletes because it has some of the desired effects of anabolic steroids without the androgenic effects (the deepening of the voice, growth of facial hair and thickening of the skin).

(Clenbuterol is classified as a banned stimulant, NOT a steroid by WADA).

Clenbuterol has been detected in several tests for athletes in other regulated sports, so it should be publicly known as a substance an athlete does not want to be caught taking.

Jessica Hardy has been reported to have asthma. In fact, Hardy has a TUE in effect for several other substances which are in the banned list. An exemption can be granted for certain substances if proven that the athlete would suffer serious health issues by not taking them.

A Therapeutic Use Exemption often sets accepted levels of concentration for certain substances. After certain concentrations, the therapeutic benefit has been achieved and concentrations in excess would be unnecessary in relation to the athletes’ health. This would equate to testing positive to the substance without a TUE and the athlete would be subject to disciplinary action.

In the US, several effective anti-asthmatic pharmaceuticals are available and are eligible for TUEs, if medically necessary.

QUESTIONS:

So, did Hardy take the substance knowingly? She already had a TUE in effect for other substances used to treat her respiratory condition.

Why would she have jeopardized her spot on the US Olympic Team?

Might someone she trusted have provided the substance to her and presented it as one of her TUE included medications?

OUTCOME?

There are MANY unanswered questions and until more facts come to light, there is no way to condemn Jessica Hardy as a cheater.

It is understandable, and assumed, that many details are not publicly known because there is an active investigation in process and an appeal appears to be forthcoming.

Unfortunately, the facts that are currently being disseminated are not looking promising for Hardy or the US Olympic Team.

http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugs_concern/clenbuterol.htm

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru

Jessica Hardy Negative Drug Test Not Positive After All

The spotlight is once again on a banned substance that the World Anti-Doping Agency WADA (in coordination with the International Olympic Committee) has included on their anti-doping list. USA 2008 Team swimmer, Jessica Hardy’s two positive test results for a banned stimulant (Clenbuterol) was reported by the AP Wednesday, July 23, 2008. An earlier test had produced a negative result.

Clenbuterol has several uses. For one, it is prescribed as a bronchodilator to be used in the treatment of breathing disorders such as asthma. It is similarly used in the veterinary field for horses.

More controversial, and the reason for the ban in organized sports, is the use by athletes to rapidly lose weight, increase muscle mass, and decrease fat. It does this by increasing the rate at which fat and protein are used up in the body. Because of this, it is commonly seen in the body-building community. The use of this stimulant has been seen in other sports as well. Several baseball players have admitted to the use of clenbuterol.

Clenbuterol works much like Ephedrine but the desired effects last for days in comparison to the hours of effectiveness for Ephedrine.

Direct use of this drug is most common, but in 2006, ironically, 330 people in Shanghai may have been poisoned by eating pork contaminated by Clenbuterol that had been fed to the animals to increase the leanness of the meat.

In response to the positive banned substance tests, Hardy (by way of her agent) has admitted to no wrongdoing and her stance is that she has not cheated. It is unknown if Hardy will appeal the findings. Even if she appeals, the likliehood of her being able to participate in the 2008 Beijing Olympics is low. First time offenders are typically banned for two years.

Hardy was already entered into the 100 breast, the 50 freestyle and 400 free relay by the U.S. Olympic Committee.

The list of banned stimulants is lengthy. For athletes, familiarity with all of the substances is crucial. Knowledge of the Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) is useful for those athletes that have medical conditions which require daily medication as some of these substances can be used in certain situations.

For more information about anti-doping issues:

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
The Official website of the Olympic Movement
A Guide to the World Anti-Doping Code
Performance Enhancing Medications and Drugs of Abuse

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google Reader Magnolia Ask.com Netscape Newsgator Newsvine RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Technorati ReadMe.ru